Date of Award
Spring 6-3-2017
Document Type
Honors Project
University Scholars Director
Dr. Jeff Keuss
First Advisor/Committee Member
Dr. Carlene Brown
Second Advisor/Committee Member
Dr. Brian Chin
Abstract
This paper examines the musical philosophy of composer John Cage in terms of psychological theories and experimental design. A literature review was first conducted to extract testable hypotheses from Cage’s musical works, writings, and interviews relevant to theories and research in empirical aesthetics. A study was then devised to examine the relationships between cognitive appraisals of the interestingness, enjoyableness, orderliness, and musicality of general sound events, as well as to determine the influence of openness to experience and the effect of two intentional-listening strategies, inspired by Cage’s ideas, on these relationships. Participants (n = 21) completed an openness to experience questionnaire, listened to 20 sound recordings, and responded to each sound on a cognitive appraisal form. Participants were also randomly assigned to one of three groups (n = 7) and were encouraged to adopt one of two intentional listening strategies, or no strategy, depending on assignment. The analysis found significant relationships for interestingness, enjoyableness, and orderliness in predicting musicality, though scatter plot distributions suggest that orderliness is less essential to musicality than interestingness and enjoyableness. Openness to experience was found to be insignificant for all appraisals and relationships, as were the listening strategies, with one exception: appraisals of interestingness were found to decrease as a result of adopting a Cage-inspired listening strategy, though the validity of this result is suspect.
Recommended Citation
Gillispie, Braden J., "Empirical Aesthetics and the Philosophy of John Cage: A Literature Review and Experimental Study" (2017). Honors Projects. 64.
https://digitalcommons.spu.edu/honorsprojects/64
Copyright Status
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Additional Rights Information
Copyright held by author.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Comments
A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the University Scholars Program