Faculty-Student Collaboration

1

Faculty Sponsor(s)

Brittany Tausen, Ph.D.

Presentation Type

Event

Project Type

Completed quantitative research study

Primary Department

Psychology

Description

Outgroup members, such as individuals who are homeless are often dehumanized. While indirect contact (observing or learning about another person’s interaction with a member of a marginalized group) can reduce negative attitudes towards outgroup members, the conditions under which indirect contact is most (and least) likely to mitigate dehumanization have yet to be explored. In two studies, we investigated similarity as a boundary condition of indirect contact. Results indicated a significant effect of similarity when defined by university affiliation and interest in psychology (study 1), but not when defined by state of origin, political & religious identity (study 2). These conflicting findings indicate that some forms of similarity might be more impactful than others, or that the efficacy of indirect contact could be better explained by confounding variables (e.g., likability, warmth) not measured in the current studies.

Comments

This poster was also presented at WPA, San Francisco, 10/2020

Copyright Status

http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/

Additional Rights Information

Copyright held by author(s).

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS
 
May 27th, 1:00 PM

Exploring social distance as a boundary condition of indirect contact

Outgroup members, such as individuals who are homeless are often dehumanized. While indirect contact (observing or learning about another person’s interaction with a member of a marginalized group) can reduce negative attitudes towards outgroup members, the conditions under which indirect contact is most (and least) likely to mitigate dehumanization have yet to be explored. In two studies, we investigated similarity as a boundary condition of indirect contact. Results indicated a significant effect of similarity when defined by university affiliation and interest in psychology (study 1), but not when defined by state of origin, political & religious identity (study 2). These conflicting findings indicate that some forms of similarity might be more impactful than others, or that the efficacy of indirect contact could be better explained by confounding variables (e.g., likability, warmth) not measured in the current studies.

Rights Statement

In Copyright
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.